Premier League shirt gambling ban is a cynical and transparent move.
Premier League shirt gambling ban is a cynical and transparent move.
The Premier League are getting ahead of the legislation but there is some good PR to be had if clubs refused to deal with bookmakers entirely.

Many people criticised the idea, with one commentator saying it was a “moral panic”. What do you think? I think it's a good decision. There is a lot of fuss last week about the Premier League decision to remove gambling sponsors from the front of shirts from 2026 while leaving all other forms of betting advertising untouched. But I think it's a good decision. Gambling is a problem, and it's not good for people's mental health. So I

The decision to issue a press release about the pending legislation was cynical and transparent. It was an attempt to get ahead of possible future legislation, and it showed that the company was not interested in working with the legislators.

That’s pocket change for the top clubs, and it’s not even close to the biggest chunk of their income. The biggest sponsor in the league, Emirates, brings in around £175million per annum, while the richest club, Manchester United, pulls in £530million.

This on-shirt advertising is not in line with the company's values and is not effective.

That's a good question that I don't have a definitive answer to. I think it might have something to do with the fact that gambling companies make a lot of money by convincing people to gamble and then taking their money. I'm not sure if it's a conscious decision or not, but I think it might be a bit of a self-defeating strategy.

That is why the FA should refuse any more gambling money. It’s not just morally bankrupt – it’s also bad business.

That is a great point. We could also actually be attracting a different demographic who want to support something that stands for something else. If a gambling company were to sponsor our club and advertise their product, it would be in direct competition with them and we could potentially attract a different customer base.

There are also other countries with similar bans. For example, Norway has a total ban on smoking in indoor public places, which includes bars and restaurants. And Sweden has a total ban on smoking in all enclosed public places.

But what about now? The European Union has banned all advertising for tobacco products, in an effort to reduce the number of people who start smoking and the number of people who continue to smoke. In the UK, the government introduced a Tobacco Advertising and Marketing Prohibition Law in 2007. This banned all commercial advertising of tobacco products, with the exception of promotional materials for tobacco products made for licensed tobacco producers, importers and dealers. In the United States, the federal government

But what about the people who are addicted to gambling? Surely they must be aware of the risks? The statistics on gambling addiction are complex. There is no one-size-fits-all answer, as addiction can vary hugely from person to person. However, the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) report that around 2.5% of the population are problem gamblers, and that prevalence increases with age. What are the risks of gambling?

It is understandable that people are concerned about the increasing prevalence of betting companies advertising in sport - particularly given the negative publicity that has surrounded some of these ads in the past. However, I don't think that this is something that is going to significantly impact the industry in the near future, as betting companies are likely to move onto other mediums in the meantime. Additionally, any negative publicity will likely only serve to increase the popularity of betting companies, as people will seek to avoid being associated with

There is no doubt that football clubs and footballers have a duty of care to their local community. Football clubs have been known to support local communities in a number of ways, from donating money to food banks to raising money for local charities. There is no doubt that these are important and unique civic institutions, and as such they have a duty of care to their community. However, there is a growing concern that football clubs and footballers are increasingly promoting something that is seen as problematic.

That said, some legitimate business practices need to be followed in order to ensure the club is sustainable. For example, any team sponsored by a company or organisation should be given preferential treatment when it comes to ticket allocation and merchandising sales. In addition, any money made from multimedia rights or other commercial ventures should be reinvested back into the club.

I hope so.

You’ve done a really great job with your life so far, but I think you can do even more.

What's your reaction?


0 comment

Write the first comment for this!

Facebook Conversations

Disqus Conversations